The struggle between India and Pakistan intensified sharply on Saturday with both parties aimed at the air bases and blaming each one of each one for hitting first, since the United States again asked both sides to be discouraged.
Pakistan said that India had pointed at least three of its air bases with surface air missiles in the early hours of Saturday, including Nur Khan, a key installation of the Air Force near the capital, Islamabad. Witnesses in the city of Rawalpindi, where Nur Khan is located, informed having heard at least three strong explosions, and one describes a “great fireball” visible from miles away.
In a matter of hours, Pakistan said he had retaliation using surface surface missiles against several places in India, including the Udhampur and Pathankot air bases and a missile storage installation. “One eye for an eye,” said the Pakistani army in a statement.
India, however, also described his action on Saturday as reprisals. The Indian army said that he had achieved several Pakistani military objectives, two of them radar sites, in response to a wave of Pakistani attacks in 26 locations using donuts, long -range weapons and combat planes. There was a “limited damage” to the team and personnel in four bases of the Indian Air Force, said Vyomika Singh, a Air Force officer of India, at a press conference on Saturday.
“It is the Pakistani actions that have constituted provocation and climbing,” said Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Miskri. “In response, India has defended and reacted in a responsible and measured manner.”
In the midst of the statements and counter -demonstrations, it was clear that the night involved part of the heaviest military commitment on both sides since India made air attacks in Pakistan on Wednesday. India accused Pakistan or has housed terrorist groups that carried out a deadly attack against tourists last month in Kashmir controlled by India. Pakistan has denied participation.
Both countries say they want on scale, but the crisis has been spiral in the most expansive confrontation between the two nations in half a century, with fierce fighting along their borders and drone throne trains.
Seth Krummrich, former colonel of the US Army.
But Mr. Krummrich, now a senior executive of the Global Guardian private security firm, also said that it focuses mainly on military objectives, and the “parity in the types, levels and locations of the attacks reflects that both parties are calibrating optimistic.” Neinder’s side is looking for a strategic “killing shot.”
India and Pakistan became separate countries in 1947 and have fought three wars, with coffee disputes in each. One of those wars, in December 1971, established the so -called control line that divides Kashmir. But India and Pakistan are separated by an international border of around 2,000 miles, and in this conflict, each points to sites far beyond Kashmir.
Each military response makes tasks affect people who live near border areas; The civilian dishes have died, the boxes have kured and many houses have damaged the bone.
Iphtkhar Ahmed, a politician from Rajouri de Cashmira, said four people died in his neighborhood after being hit by the artillery fire that began on Friday night and continued until Saturday. Mr. Ahmed, like many others in the area, is used to bombarding, but the previous episodes did not last long. “This time, it was very long and intense.”
The intensifier crisis has caused alarms throughout the world and diplomatic efforts to calm the crisis in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and other countries and strong ties with India and Pakistan.
The foreign ministers of the Group of 7 Industrialized Nations had also urged “Maximum rest of India and Pakistan” in a joint statement on Friday, warning that “an additional military escalation raises a serious threat to regional stability.”
After the heavy military exchanges on Saturday morning, the Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, spoke with the Ministers of Foreign Affairs of India and Pakistan, the count needed to find ways to descalize and communicate directly with callculation. “Department. Mr. Rubio also offered us help to begin conversations between the two countries.
Ishaq Dar, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Pakistan and Vice Prime Minister, described his call to Mr. Rubio as “very reassuring.” Mr. Dar said he told Mr. Rubio that Pakistan would not intensify, but depended on India.
“The answer we wanted to give, we have given it. Now the ball is on the court of India. If they stop this point, we will also consider stopping,” said Dar in Geo News, a Paquistani television channel. “But if they attack again, we will also respond.”
Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, Minister of External Affairs of India, said on social networks that he had spoken with Mr. Rubio on Saturday morning. “The Indian approach has always been measured and responsible and remains so,” he said in the position.
With both sides blaming each other for the climbing, there is no disaster in sight, and the fears are growing between the people of India and Pakistan about what could happen next.
Hari Kumar” Hishasini raj and Pragati Kb Contributed reports.
