A police guard dog has complained of Ofcom about an episode or panorama about Chris Kaba’s shooting.
The Independent Police Behavior Office (IAPC) went to the transmission control agency after its Public apology for BBC was unsatisfied, after the program was initially issued without including the IAPC statement in response to Nasema.
A BBC spokeswoman said that the ruling of the Executive Complaints Unit of the Corporation (ECU) had judged the complaint that “resolved” after having accepted bone as a supervision not to include the point of view of the IAPC; The Iplayer version and the online article were rapidly modified.
Kaba was shot dead after he tried to get out of a police vehicle stop in southern London in September 2022.
Sergeant Martyn Blake, an officer of the Specialist Arms Unit MO19, was found not guilty of murder in October last year, which caused protests from the Kaba family.
Speaking after the verdict at Old Bailey, Mr. Kaba’s family said it was “a painful test that the system does not value our lives.”
Naseem told BBC Panorama that, in his opinion, I was not convinced that Kaba presented a sufficient danger to justify me.
He suggested that the investigation of the murder on Mr. Blake launched himself in the midst of pressure on the possible disturbances, which is denied by the IAPC.
The IAPC complained that the program did not make Mr. Naseem no longer work for the guard dog, and that he was not given the clean right to respond to the statements about why the investigation was launched.
In the program, Mr. Naseem said that when the IAPC launched its homicide investigation four days after the shooting, “the return returned us … that if we had done it at that time, Lickely would have a level of bone disorder.”
The IAPC statement denied this was added to the Iplayer version of the Panorama episode and the online news.
The statement said: “The decisions of criminally investigating Sergeant Blake, and then sending the case to the Service of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Crown (CPS), followed a careful consideration of a significant amount of gathered evidence that the Government turned from the relevant evidence and mockery”
According to the BBC complaint unit trial, Panorama should have provided the IAPC with specific information about the statements that will be presented in this regard and, therefore, found an element of injustice for IAPC.
However, he pointed out that programs manufacturers had tasks that subfey the action to include the right of the organization to respond in the Iplayer version and the related online article, which was considered “enough to solve this aspect of the complaint.”
But the IAPC said Thursday that he had complained to Ofcom because he was “greatly dissatisfied that, despite admitting these two infractions of her own guidelines, the BBC has firmly refused to apologize publicly despite the fact that IAPC provides evidence to show the serious reputation damage caused by the organization as a result of the program.
“In particular, the suggestion within that program, which the IAPC was pressed to begin a homicide investigation, was wrong and resulted in the public criticisms of several media and individual organizations, including the concerns raised by the London Assembly and local councilors on the independence and motivations of the IAPC.
“If we had aware that this would be suggested, we would have refuted it strongly.”
Naseem said in the panorama that he completely accepted the jury’s verdict, but that he remained in the IAPC decision to send the case to the Crown Prosecutor’s Office (CPS).
