The Cala Homes developer had presented an appeal to the planning inspection before the decision of the Council based on non-effective non-effect when a developer believes that a council is inappropriately stored.
The Council has now presented arguments about why it believes that the plans for 97 houses in the lane of the priests between Brentwood Town Center and Shenfield are inappropriate.
Concerns about access road, density and development were out of place with the surrounding area and the lack of pedestrian access and cycle cycle raised the duration planning meetings and in the comments on the plans.
It occurs after the same request was deferred at a meeting of the Planning Committee in December last year about the concerns about the number of homes proposed by the site, which, it is reported, was 30 percent higher than that cited in the Local Development Plan.
The plans are to build 97 houses in a small section of a larger plot in Lane priests, which only has 75 houses assigned by the counter.
Cala Homes has argued that the Council should have made a decision before and now wants a taken by the inspector.
The Council has said that it is looking for improvements, but the plans have not been altered since the developer was presented for the first time.
The member of the Planning Committee, Keith Barber, said: “The main problem that has to do with the amount of housing on the site.
“I think that residents will feel disappointed to hear that this is almost an academic debate and the determination will be carried out by an inspector. He has tasks of decision making of this counter and has given it to an inspector and I think that is very unfortunate.
“You are looking for improvements and there are none.”
Concerns about the parking lot and the left between the development and the widest area also arose. The members of the planning committee were asked to consider how they would have voted if there were no leg.
The committee voted unanimously to reject the request at the meeting on April 15.
