Recently I have read some online speech that surrounds silent weekends in the base matches, with people arguing for and against them. We should not need them, because parents should have it. But we need them, because you don’t behave. But also the coaches complain, because they can enter as much as they would like. Which leads me to the question within the title of this article; Do you know what they are supposed to do?
For a long time I believed that a coach should be working hard to make obsolete issues. Train and prepare players so well that they don’t need you. They should be able to stop only two feet without the coach telling them what to do every second of the game. However, I feel based, the term “training” does a lot of heavy work. What is more likely to see is joysticking, micrognition and emotional ventilation. These are things that parents love to do. When we say “without coaching from the bulge” with respect to parents, they are not training children, they are only barking instructions and letting out their frustrations. It is not useful for children, and the only purpose that serves is to act as a cheap form of adult therapy that should be help for the sex of the sea for their mental health.
When announcing a silent weekend, there is always a violent reaction. Those parents who are always nervous. You know the guy. They approach the games in a tracksuit, but they never sacrifice to train. They always occupy a part of the band line closer to the position his son plays. They use the term “we” when referring to a U8 team for which they do not play the coach. They throw their arms with disgust and frustration when a player loses the ball, or the referee does not give the decision he wants, in a movement that I call “doing Jesus.” They also have some strange phrases that constantly bark the child, with small phrases, which have made me as an adult, which makes me lose my train or thought. “Do you return to your corridor? What is talking?” The child is probably either has an idea, so they are visible they seem increasingly scared every time Dad prohibits it.
Once again, we find rule 80:20. 80% of their time and workload will be dedicated to 20% or parents that cause problems. It is not an exact rule, but we have the feeling behind him. We all love the Father who gives you a wave or assent, whom you never listen to the margin, and you not only know his first name. His son is absolutely no problem and only continues with him. “Thank you coach!” They shout in your direction, while climbing in the car. The only interaction that he will have with that father all week, separated from his reaction perhaps to his WhatsApp message asking for assistance.
A beautiful relationship that must be kept.
But what about others? They often do not lead these new progressive ideas too childish. “The Kids these Days Are Too Soft! And these Namby, Pamby Silent Weekends Are Only Going To Continue To Mollycoddle a Generation of Snowflakes! If They To Go Pro, Myey’re Going To Have To Get Use Tohout at Hack And Chanming Ith Iting and Hooding It. ITS Italing and Hooding Iting and Hooding Iting and Hooding Iting and Hooding Iting and Hooding Iting and Hooding Iting and Hooding Iting and Hood that Iting and Ifses Itending and Ifses Iting and Ifse Iting and IFS.
“What, so you are supposed to praise my son when they do something good?”
-
It’s not about you. It’s about the child. You are not the main character.
-
The parents regularly praise the wrong things, such as starting the ball for a launch instead of maintaining it and making a skill or pass.
-
You can praise them after the game.
-
Children need to learn to do things without adults being close.
It is a redundant question, made of bad faith, which is supposed to reduce the options to itself or not, in an attempt to catch it.
“Yes, or of course, you must praise children when they do something good.”
“Thank you! So why are we doing these stupid silent weekends?”
“No, you should be saying something at all.”
“Don’t tell me how father! It’s my son and I’ll do what I want!”
That last is composed with “Do you have children yourself?” When 99% of the time, the father knows the answer and asks what could be a very inensible and hurtful question.
As a millennium who has been training since 2008, I would like to respond with “no, because its lot bothered the economy, which means that none of us can possess properties, and because it has ruined the environment, which means that if I decide to procreate, I have consciously done consciously knowing the imminent fall that our planet faces that my description will have to suffer.
When I have trained, arbitrated or simply observed the base youth games worldwide, it still bothers me that after all this time, with all our increases in technology, with all the advances in the education of the coach, the youth teams compete are still regularly seen without a clear idea of how or what they are supposed to be doing. Only in restarting, such as kicks and releases, they don’t know where to stand. It is easy, and something that many players are very good (especially when your team defends a counterattack).
This for me is much of the reason why coaches protest on silent weekends. He worries that his method is not to train the team in training, he is instructing the games of themes. Now that power has a leg temporarily far from them. Does this family sound? Ask the following questions;
-
How sure would your team work or close to your regular levels if you are there?
-
Are they able to execute warming without you?
-
Is there any player or group of players who can make team conversations?
-
Do you know the form of possession?
-
Do you know the way out of possession?
-
Do you know how to press and defend themselves as a unit?
-
Do you know how to build and create attacks?
-
Do you know the defensive organization in the set-just?
Perhaps some of that is too advanced for the age group with which he is working, in which case we observe concepts associated with phases of the game;
-
Do you know what to do when we have the ball?
-
Do you know what they do when we have the ball?
-
Do you know what to do when we win the ball?
-
Do you know what to do when we lose the ball?
And even simpler, if we are still looking at individuals instead of groups;
-
Do you know what to do when they have the ball at their feet?
-
Do you know what to do when a teammate has the ball near?
-
Do you know what to do when a teammate has the ball away?
-
Do you know what to do when an opponent has the ball at their feet?
-
Do you know what to do when an opponent has the ball, but another teammate is closer?
-
Do you know what to do when an opponent has the ball, but they are far?
Sometimes we are not even looking at the forms of 11v11 or 9v9. Sometimes it is really basic concepts of how to behave in possession and out of possession. That is why the coaches shout the player in the ball what to do and what to do “do not live it there!” Or “Don’t play with that!” Players have not been shown what to do and, therefore, do not understand what to do. That is why games are so transitional, and the teams make very few pass sequences that are more than three passes. The teams will play a very rigid form, with very little freedom or creativity, and expect the ball to end with one of its best players, who can drive and shoot from outside the box. Of course, you can win some games, but it will not help develop any player, and it is not fun in the long term.
What happens when you have the basic routines, the forms and a collective understanding of what to do in certain situations? Interestingly, you can train less, observe more, and when you train, it becomes deeper and more significant. I tend to find that coaches who say less users have equipment that play better, because they are not extinguishing fires. Coach A can say 1000 words in half, but it makes no sense. Coach B can say 100 words in half, but everything is useful, well intermittent and significant.
We are preparing children for a future in which we no longer exist. So, while you are close, teach them so well, they can do it without you.
