The forensic of eastern London, Graeme Irvine, criticized head doctors at a public hearing on Thursday (April 10), saying that their deficiencies were obstructing their court and creating a “systemic racism” towards the deceased.
They were ordered by two doctors to the courts after their GP surgery referred to the death of a 94 -year -old woman without good for her investigation.
He accused a head doctor not doing his job correctly and said that similar Widspers faults were placing an unnecessary charge for their staff.
“The problem is that the quality of the death of doctors has become incredible poor,” he said.
“A significant group for me is that the communications I receive from GP practices tell me that doctors who are asked for this information simply do not understand the forensic medical system … They do not have the first clue if toy toys or fashion tea touches are tea toys are the cold of the toyage of the toys of the toys of the toys of the toys of the toy Toy toy toy toy.
The coroner added that head doctors seemed to be doing their job much better in relation to Jewish and Muslim patients than “the white Christian community”, creating an “absolutely unfair” situation similar to “systemic racism”, where white families were more to their post of their exams.
Mr. Irvine made the comments at a review audience prior to the ragged in the death of Joyce Johnson, by Beauly Way, Romford.
His death, which occurred in the speech of his house, was referred to the court on March 19.
“It is inexcusable that a coronial decision has not been made at this stage,” he said.
“I have looked very closely at the circumstances surrounding Joyce Johnson’s death and it seems to me that Mrs. Johnson has died as a natural cause of death, and I am scaring a purity of a dignity of purity.”
Irvine said doctors seemed to be using the Forensic Court instead of the Forensic Medical Service.
After it was discovered that the serial killer, Dr. Harold Shipman, had been killing his elderly patients and then registering their deaths, medical doctors were introduced.
GPS decisions about the causes of death can be examined by medical doctors to make sure they are not lying or making mistakes.
Given the “very low probable threshold” so that general doctors make decisions of cause of death, in addition to the “controls and balances” of the Forensic Medical Service, the coroner said there was no generation so that Docton referred to deaths to their court, a woman of strength, childbirth stoppage with significant comications. ”
“It seems to me to cling that someone in surgery could not have sacrifice a cause of death,” he said.
“Was it laziness? Was it inaction? Was it a nervousness for the system? Ignorance on that, the procedure is? A reluctance to contact the forensic doctor? I don’t know.”
One of the head doctors called to the Forensic Court of East London told Mr. Ivine that the death of Mrs. Johnson had her leg “unexpected” by the family of the family and that they resist attributing it to natural causes.
“Without lack of respect for Mrs. Johnson’s family, whether or not they were waiting for Mrs. Johnson Diera has very little impact on my decision making here in this court,” said Mr. Irvine.
“If you trust a family member, through your reception, it means that you are not doing your job correctly. Do you understand?”
Read more: Research launched after MAN, 45, dies in a police custody in Romford
He continued: “The doctors of surgery must understand what the procedure is. They need to understand the Forensic Medical Service.
“But the fact is that it is inexcusable now, three weeks after the death of this poor woman, that the family does not have the legs capable of making funeral arrangements.
“I am not demanding that you sacrifice a cause of death in all cases. That would be completely wrong. If you have concerns, if you have genuine doubts about the accuracy of a cause of death, that is perfectly fine.”
