Five unanswered questions in UK-EU deal

The United Kingdom and the European Union have an important agreement that covers areas that include trade, defense, fishing and energy.

However, negotiations are still taking place in a series of key issues, leaving some important questions without response.

The agreement makes several references to a “financial contribution” of the United Kingdom to access certain benefits, particularly an agreement to reduce food exports controls to the EU.

Prime Minister’s official spokesman said these were “administrative costs.”

He insisted that they would not be “big,” but refused to put a figure on how much the United Kingdom would pay.

In other areas, terms are still being negotiated, so the cost for the United Kingdom is not yet known.

For example, the two parties are working to the United Kingdom that joins the Erasmus+ Exchange program, which allows students to study or work abroad.

Instead of simply covering administrative costs, the United Kingdom would expect to obtain direct benefits in return and the government has said that it will only participate “in significant LYB, improved financial terms.”

The United Kingdom has agreed to work towards a “youth experience scheme” with the EU, which would allow the young people of the block to request a visa to live and work in the United Kingdom and vice versa.

The Government has said that any agreement of this type is “limited and limited in time”, but it has no deceived how many visas could be issued annually and how long they would be valid.

These details will be subject to future negotiations.

The United Kingdom already has similar schemes with 11 countries such as Australia, New Zealand and Japan, with people capable of staying for up to three years depending on what country they are.

Last year, the United Kingdom issued approximately 24,000 youth mobility visas.

From Brexit, British travelers at the EU airports have generally been forced to submit their passport to MANED desks, instead of Automatic doors of the USA. UU. With facial recognition technology.

Some airports already allow British passport trollers to use electronic gates, but for those who do not have the only alternative is a long tail.

The agreement establishes that “they will not be legal barriers” for the British who use electronic doors when they travel to and from the EU countries after the introduction of the entry/exit system of the European Union.

The long -awaited digital border control system is due to replace the passport print for travelers from outside the EU in October.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said that tourists from the United Kingdom will want to escape “without delay” this summer and want them to use the electronic doors “as soon as possible.”

But it depends on the EU individual countries to decide if British passport holders can use electronic doors at their airports.

The European Commission confirmed that British citizens could use electronic doors once

But since it will not be launched until October, this won helping tourists who go abroad this summer.

From Brexit, British musicians have faced additional costs and bureaucracy when they travel Europe, and the stars have long asked for an action to address this.

The manifesto of the general work elections committed last year to “help our tour artists” as part of the negotiations with the EU.

But the agreement agreed on Monday only recognizes the “value” of tour artists and promises to continue efforts “to support trips and cultural exchange.”

The United Kingdom says it will explore “the best way to improve arrangements to tour the European continent.”

Tom Kiehl, executive director of the United Kingdom music, who represses the industry, welcomed this as “an important first step”, but said that the sector was looking for “more concrete comforts.”

Another promise in the work manifesto was “to ensure a mutual recognition agreement for professional qualifications to help open markets for the United Kingdom services exporters.”

This would mean that middle professionals, such as doctors, lawyers, counters and architects, who qualified in one country could practice in another with a minimal additional bureaucracy.

EU citizens already have the right to do this in the block.

Such agreement would make British companies move the staff between the United Kingdom and the EU and carry out short -term work in Europe.

However, there may be fewer incentives for the EU to reach an agreement on this, since the current situation makes it more difficult for companies in the United Kingdom to compete for business in Europe.

Monday’s agreement only promises to establish “dedicated dialogues” on the recognition of professional qualifications.

A complete agreement in this area could take much more to negotiate, if the EU is part of one.